My apologies, but I still disagree with you, as well as your decree on whose data is reliable and whose is not.
It is impossible to discredit data because you dismiss their algorithm as skewed, when every set of data reflected online is set by someone’s algorithm, as is also the case when no algorithm is included.
In any study, the researcher sets the criteria by which what is to be studied will be judged.
As retired university faculty who sat on both Masters and Doctoral committees, I am very familiar with how research data is accumulated and adjudicated.
Additionally, everywhere I looked online (even after my last response to you), the figures continue to support the ratings reflexed here on MDL.
These may not agree with your opinion, but you cannot change the ratings here nor elsewhere online simply because you disagree with them.
Attempting to do so is as futile as Don Quixote tilting with windmills - it produces nothing.
You are certainly have the right and are welcome to your preference for QoT - but so is everyone who prefers LR, who have the equal right to their preference without being told their opinion is illegitimate, which was why I decided to respond to your comment.
There is no right or wrong here, just personal preference, which each individual is entitled to hold.
Hopefully, you are open-minded enough to be gracious enough to give others the same right to their opinion, preference and defense thereof as you defend yours so vehemently here.