Since few aggressive feminists have decided up on them on what's right and what's wrong & whom to throw under the bus,
I have decided to start this to understand why these feminists are getting so crazy rattled by a mere observation and discussion of Kdrama characteristics of FL and ML.
Let's start shall we ->
It is no surprise that most if not all Kdrama romance have a specific template for the FL and the ML.
The FL in most kdramas will have liked/loved/dated/shagged other men before finally settling down and marrying the ML.
The ML in most kdramas is a pure virgin who never even liked any woman except the FL. More often than not, the ML would be in love with FL since he was a child. If not, he has reasons, even though he is super handsome, rich and successful to not have dated, Trauma is a fav trope used to keep ML away from dating.
These ML's are almost always pure virgins who do not even make eye contact with any woman. It's not like women are shown to be attracted to them. The drama shows even though women are attracted to these ML's, they never get deflowered by choice.
Only the FL is allowed to the deflower the pure virgin ML's.
Question are as below ->
1. Do modern feminists who want modern outlook on love and life where they are free to date and shag multiple men want to end up with a pure virgin conservative man?
2. Why do feminists like dramas like these where the ML is always a pure virgin? Isn't it exactly opposite to feminist beliefs?
3. Why does Kdrama keep making romance dramas with the same kind of FL's and pure virgin ML's? Do Asian women prefer dramas where they have sexual options and want to marry a pure virgin marry who only ever loved them?
4. Why do feminists get triggered when people describe whats happening in the drama and want to question why the ML is always a pure virgin?
